[pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.org
Wed Nov 23 04:21:08 EST 2011


On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 04:36:51PM +0100, Seth Mos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Op 20 nov 2011, om 16:33 heeft Eugen Leitl het volgende geschreven:
> 
> > Great, I'll take the plunge, then. Thanks!
> 
> Just for extra clarification, the images on http://files.pfsense.org/jimp/ipv6/ are the easiest to start rolling and to have a reasonably stable starting point.
> 
> We only make these when a new feature is introduced and broken ones are yanked soon. Contrary to normal snapshots.

Just upgraded to http://files.pfsense.org/jimp/ipv6/pfSense-Full-Update-2.1-DEVELOPMENT-i386-20111021-1243.tgz
on a SuperMicro Atom -- system boots fine but I'm getting
Crash report begins.  Anonymous machine information:

i386
8.1-RELEASE-p6
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p6 #1: Fri Oct 21 12:51:27 EDT 2011     root at bsd8x86.pingle.org:/usr/obj.pfSense/usr/pfSensesrc/src/sys/pfSense_SMP.8

Crash report details:

Filename: /var/crash/minfree
2048

Is this of any concern?
Should I follow the suggestion in the
crash reporter, and upgrade to a new snapshot?
 
> Regards,
> 
> Seth
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list
> List at lists.pfsense.org
> http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE


More information about the List mailing list